|FORMER UNC COACH BUTCH DAVIS (Paul Abell/US Presswire)|
The reprimand was announced on Friday and came roughly a month after the NCAA's infractions committee imposed sanctions on the Tar Heels' football program.
The SIFS (Suits in Indianapolis (Formerly Kansas)) gave the Tar Heels' football program a one-year postseason ban, a reduction of 15 scholarships and three years of probation, capping a nearly two-year investigation into improper benefits and academic misconduct.
So exactly what is the point of an ACC committee weighing in now...?
"The ACC's balance of academics, athletics and integrity will continue to be the cornerstones by which this league operates," ACC commissioner John Swofford said. "As I have said previously, it is disturbing anytime one of our member institutions has NCAA infractions issues. Such issues are counter to the goals and aspirations of our conference."
The ACC's 12-person committee, which consists of athletic directors and faculty athletics representatives, issued the reprimand for the university's responsibility for the major violations documented in the NCAA report.
UNC spokesman Steve Kirschner issued a statement saying the "unfortunate and regrettable experiences of the last few years have been difficult for the University community to endure, but we believe UNC will be a better and stronger member of the conference going forward."
The postseason ban is for this fall and prevents the Tar Heels from playing in either the ACC championship game or a bowl game. The scholarship reductions would be five per year, also starting in the fall.