In short, the aftermath of the Jerry Sandusky scandal will cause this venerable university to suffer in every conceivable area of import in ways that will make Maryland’s problems following the death of Len Bias and the banishment of Lefty Driesell look like a walk in the park.
This is the big one. Within a matter of days, every senior administrator at Penn State should be relieved of their duties, and in all likelihood many will be. The Athletic Director, Tim Curley, and the senior vice president for business and finance (who evidently oversees the campus police department) are already gone. Reports today say head coach Joe Paterno will resign at the end of the season and that PSU president Graham Spanier has already been privately terminated.
|SANDUSKY and PATERNO IN BETTER TIMES|
Everybody to a man or woman with any knowledge of this needs to be purged from the system. No excuses accepted. “I told my boss,” can’t possibly be an acceptable defense.
That said, we feel sorry for Penn State, its students, parents, scholarship athletes, teachers and administrators. The world as they know is coming to a crashing halt all because a few men in powerful positions thought it more important to protect Jerry Sandusky than to protect Penn State.
Perhaps they thought the school couldn’t thrive is Sandusky was arrested and prosecuted. If that was their strategy, it was tragically flawed. The first rule of bad news in the public relations world is “tell it all, and tell it now.” Yes, booster money would have temporarily slowed and a prize recruit or two may have headed off to a rival’s campus, but the total damage would have been much less than what is now anticipated.
The simple fact that the revered 84-year-old head coach who holds the record for most career wins is at the center of the scandal is even more discouraging. Disgraced coaches and athletic directors who have fallen victim to the mistakes and escapades of their nineteen to twenty-something charges must all want to call a press conference and say “REALLY?”
(See related story below)
Yesterday, long-time T.A.H. reader, one-time T.A.H. football correspondent and de-facto president of T.A.H.’s CC Nation, John Clark (Florida State) sent a text saying he had just read the grand jury report. To say that barrister Clark (who has two young sons) was a bit upset would be an understatement of immense proportions. We traded some text noting our disbelief in the chosen course of actions taken/not taken by all the parties and some of that string was reflected in yesterday’s post. (Mostly the part where we said "Effing" a lot.)
Today, we proceeded to read the 23-page Grand Jury report. Truth be known, we have a pretty strong stomach and if one were to replace Victims 1 through 8 with consenting adults, we would not have found this diatribe so disconcerting and disgusting. Messed up, yes, but not gut-wrenchingly foul. However, the victims were consistently nine- and ten-year-old boys plucked from the organization The Second Mile, a charity Sandusky founded for at-risk youths way back in 1977. Appalled, we stopped reading after 16 pages (the beginning of Victim 5).
Now, if you are inclined think the victims are liars, the consistency of the pattern described by each victim speaks volumes about their collective credibility. If they made these stories up, they each made up a remarkably consistent version of Sandusky’s seductive habits.
What’s fascinating is how clear the story seems to emerge if the Grand Jury report is accurate. Now, mainstream media has been tiptoeing around some of these issues, but we are going to give it to you straight. If you are under 18 stop reading this NOW and go ask your parents to explain this to you if they are so inclined. If you are over 18, here are the bullet points:
- · Jerry Sandusky played at Penn State and coached there for 23 years. He also coached high school football.
- · Sandusky is married and has six adopted children.
- · In 1977, Sandusky started “The Second Mile” a charity dedicated to underprivileged kids in State College, PA.
- · Sandusky was the subject of a sexual misconduct investigation in 1998 and he retired from PSU in 1999.
- · In 2002, Penn State grad assistant Mike McQueary heard (CONTENT ALERT) “rhythmic, slapping sounds” he believed to be “those of sexual activity.” He saw “a naked boy” estimated age of 10 “with his hands up against the wall, be subjected to a*** intercourse by a naked Sandusky.”
- · The next day, McQueary reported what he had seen to Paterno. A day later, Paterno summoned PSU A.D. Tim Curley to his home and told him that McQueary had seen Sandusky “fondling or doing something of sexual nature to a young boy."
- (Note to readers, there is a theme starting here. McQueary was pretty clear about what he saw and assuming he reported what he said to the Grand Jury to Paterno, it would seem that Joe Pa started the process of watering down the allegations to what PSU officials wrongly believed was an acceptable level.)
- · “Approximately, one and a half weeks later, McQueary met with Curley and Senior VP Gary Shultz and reported that he had witnessed “Sandusky having a*** sex with a boy.”
- · Two weeks later, McQueary was informed by the A.D. that the Sandusky’s keys were taken and that The Second Mile was notified.
- · McQueary was never questioned by University Police or any other official organization prior to speaking to the Grand Jury.
- · The report says “The Grand Jury finds the graduate assistant’s testimony to be extremely credible.”
- · A.D. Curley testified that McQueary reported “inappropriate conduct” and he denied that McQueary reported a*** sex and termed the conduct as “horsing around.”
- · Curley informed PSU president Spanier of the info he received from McQueary (at least, Curley’s version of that info) and the subsequent action he took. Curley was not specific about the language he used to inform Spanier.
- · Schultz testified that he attended a meeting with Paterno and Curley where Joe Pa reported “disturbing” and “inappropriate behavior” by Sandusky.
- · Schultz was “very unsure” about what MeQueary had actually reported and that he had the “impression that Sandusky might have inappropriately grabbed the young boy’s genitals while wrestling.”
- · Schultz agreed to banning Sandusky from brining children into Penn State facilities and confirmed that he never reported the incident to the campus police agency or any other police agency.
- · Spanier testified that he was made aware that Sandusky was “horsing around” with a child in the locker room, but that he did not know the incident was sexual in nature nor the name of the graduate assistant (McQueary) who witnessed the incident.
- · In an odd twist on Page 11, it says McQueary and Curley testified that Sandusky himself was not banned from PSU facilities (just banned from bringing in minors) and Curley admitted that the child ban was unenforceable.
- ·The report says, “The Grand Jury finds that portions of the testimony of Tim Curley and Gary Schultz are not credible.
The burning question is why did these presumably competent professional administrators risk their careers and the reputation of the institution they loved and served to protect Jerry Sandusky?
Is loyalty within the football community at Penn State so intense, that the insiders will overlook sexual misconduct of one of their brethren? Has the “this is our house, we’re a family and what goes on here stays here and we will resolve it internally” mantra run amok?
Perhaps, the answer is ego. Is the world of upper crust administration of world-class universities and their uber-successful football programs so elitist, egotistical and segregated from the real world that, like Richard Nixon and legions of powerful wrong-thinking wrong-doers, they simply believed the rules didn’t apply to them? Is human nature the ultimate entrapment for people in power?
|CURLEY and SCHULTZ|
How could they choose to protect Jerry Sandusky over protecting their institution – an institution none of them would ever deliberately hurt in any way. But, they did choose to protect their former coach to their own demise. It seems unlikely, they planned a cover up via a carefully orchestrated conspiracy, but each time a PSU official minimized and watered down the events of that March night, the ultimate cover up grew larger and more damaging. In the end, the level of that damage to this prestigious university is almost impossible to predict.
Were they lulled into believing that the institution was so big and so powerful that it could protect Sandusky and themselves? Did they forget that it’s not Penn State’s job to protect them, but it’s simply their job to competently represent and ultimately protect Penn State?
It will take some time to sort out all these answers and some may never be known, but one read (Yes, we finished the last seven pages) of the Grand Jury report makes it clear that everybody with knowledge of what Jerry Sandusky (allegedly) did on that fateful night in March in the Lash Football Building in Happy Valley needs to step down and they need to do it now.
Sally Jenkins in the Washington Post writes today that we shouldn’t blame Paterno. Jenkins is wrong. Her initial point is alarmingly true when she points out that pedophiles are hard to recognize, but her conclusion about Joe Pa is totally wrong.
According to Jenkins, “Try to forgive Joe Paterno: When he looked at Jerry Sandusky, he didn’t see a dirty old man in a raincoat. He saw a friend, a close colleague, and a churchy do-gooder. He saw a nice guy. You’d have seen the same thing. Think not? You think you can see a clear-cut difference between an alleged child molester and a youth coach?”
Jenkins points out that the rest of the administration at Penn State failed Paterno, and we don’t disagree. We also don’t disagree that anyone (and in many cases everyone) can be fooled by sly predators like Sandusky. But in the end, Paterno is largely to blame – not for his inability to recognize that his friend and colleague was a sexual predator and child molester but for NOT launching an investigation when another employee reported witnessing a very specific inappropriate and illegal act against a child.
|THE LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL (Skip Morrow)|
For a man with a stellar reputation who has assembled a remarkable career, Paterno has made few missteps. It seems a shame the end of his career and his legacy will be linked to such a heinous crime and the series of horrible decisions made in the aftermath of its reporting.